Josh Hazlewood vs Jasprit Bumrah: Who is a better bowler in all formats at present?

Josh Hazlewood vs Jasprit Bumrah: Who Is the Better Bowler Across Formats?

Josh Hazlewood delivered a match-winning performance in the 2nd T20I against India, raising questions about his standing compared to Jasprit Bumrah. During the game at the MCG, Hazlewood’s control with the new ball dismantled India’s top order, finishing with figures of 3 for 13 in four overs. His victims included Shubman Gill, Suryakumar Yadav, and Tilak Varma.

This dominant spell restricted India to just 125 runs, putting Australia's chase in a strong position. Conversely, Bumrah was expected to respond firmly but struggled early, conceding runs which eased the target for Australia. Although he took two wickets and ended with 2 for 26, these wickets did not significantly impact the outcome.

Jasprit Bumrah is often viewed as the best pacer in contemporary cricket.

Comparing their recent performances prompts the debate about Hazlewood’s capability as a better all-format bowler than Bumrah. However, looking at their overall careers, Bumrah holds the edge with superior averages and strike rates across formats.

Summary of Key Points

Hazlewood’s 3/13 spell nearly unplayable and pivotal in bowling India out for 125.
Bumrah took 2 wickets but leaked runs early, making the chase easier.
Bumrah is generally regarded as the top pacer in current cricket.
Career stats show Bumrah as more efficient across all formats than Hazlewood.

Author's note: While Hazlewood shone in this T20I, Bumrah’s consistent excellence in all formats currently places him ahead as the more effective bowler overall.

Hindustan Times — 2025-10-31

Josh Hazlewood vs Jasprit Bumrah: Who Is the Better Bowler Across Formats?

Summary of Key Points

More News