According to Laura Clouting, the first World War curator at the Imperial War Museum in London, attitudes toward wearing the poppy have shifted significantly.
“It has now come to symbolise the sacrifice and effort of the armed forces in more recent conflicts,”
Clouting explains that these newer conflicts are often more complex and morally ambiguous, which has made the poppy a more debated symbol.
The red poppy, distinct from the white poppy used to promote peace, has been appropriated by far-right groups, according to Clouting. Those who oppose the symbol often associate it with Britain's military actions, such as those in Northern Ireland.
Clouting notes that some “see it as being connected with the actions of Britain’s army, for example in Northern Ireland.”
The children growing up in Northern Ireland during the 1960s and 1970s, who played with war relics like steel helmets, ammunition clips, and hand grenades found at home, understood how symbolism can divide communities.
These objects were tangible links to family members who fought and died in two world wars, serving as both reminders and playthings around places like Rockville Street and McCrory Park on the Falls Road in west Belfast.
The British Legion and the Imperial War Museum maintain that no one should be forced to wear the poppy, acknowledging its complex and evolving significance.
Author’s summary: The poppy’s meaning has evolved with history, reflecting sacrifice but also controversy, highlighting the importance of personal choice in its display.