Washington Sundar and South Africa’s Marco Jansen shared one view on Monday: both backed Rishabh Pant’s strategy despite India’s disappointing performance on Day 3 in Guwahati.
Sundar acknowledged that the Guwahati surface offered unpredictable bounce but dismissed the notion that it was a “snake pit.” He explained that while batting required focus and adaptability, the pitch was fair enough for both teams.
“The pitch had some assistance for bowlers, yes, but it wasn’t unplayable. Our shot selection could have been better, and that’s where we need to learn quickly,” said Washington Sundar after the day’s play.
Marco Jansen echoed the sentiment, calling Pant’s field placements and bowling changes “bold but sensible,” emphasizing that execution, not the surface, decided the outcome.
Sundar added that the team remains confident heading into the next match, focusing on discipline rather than blaming conditions.
“Every match gives us lessons. We have to trust our process and respond with clarity,” he concluded.
India faced a late collapse after a solid start, losing key wickets to South Africa’s pace and discipline. The Guwahati surface seemed to offer variable bounce early on, but the visiting bowlers maintained pressure effectively.
India’s strategy under Pant aimed to counter Jansen’s pace attack, though inconsistent shot-making eventually turned the tide in South Africa’s favor.
“It’s easy to blame the pitch, but in top-level cricket, you have to adapt. That’s what defines good teams,” observed a commentator during the post-match analysis.
Author’s summary: Washington Sundar rejected claims that the Guwahati pitch doomed India, stressing that smart execution mattered more than surface conditions.