Supreme Court and the Voting Rights Act
The Supreme Court has heard oral arguments on a case that questions whether using race as a factor in drawing congressional maps is a violation of the Constitution.
The decision could potentially render the Voting Rights Act of 1965 ineffective.
to injure no man, but to bless all mankind
as stated by Mary Baker Eddy, founder of The First Church of Christ, Scientist, which owns The Monitor.
About The Monitor
The Monitor has been publishing award-winning journalism since 1908, driven by a mission to uplift the world by seeking solutions and finding reasons for credible hope.
- Transparent ownership by The First Church of Christ, Scientist
- Journalism not driven by commercial influences
- Seeking solutions and finding reasons for credible hope
The shaping and quelling of international conflicts can feel like the exclusive province of the powerful.
Author's summary: Supreme Court decision may impact Voting Rights Act.
More News
- Palantir CEO claims company is first to be 'completely anti-woke,' backs Trump admin's bombing of drug boats
- David and Victoria Beckham Just Got New Titles Courtesy of King Charles
- A divided Queens votes in record numbers — Queens Daily Eagle
- Connor Zilisch still smarting from NASCAR Xfinity Championship loss - Speedway Digest - Home for NASCAR News
- The Home Depot Names Growscape Its 2025 Outdoor Garden Partner of the Year
- Nicki Minaj responds to backlash she received for thanking Trump after he threatened Nigeria - Face2Face Africa