Next Tuesday marks the 50th anniversary of when governor-general Sir John Kerr lawfully used constitutional power to end a political deadlock and secure funds needed for government operations. Despite this, Sir John has faced relentless criticism, even after his death.
It is important to clarify that Sir John Kerr did not remove a grossly incompetent government; the Australian people did. Kerr only provided them the opportunity, which was a consequence, not the motive, of his decision.
The anniversary is expected to trigger renewed attacks on Sir John Kerr from several fronts: a new biography of Whitlam, a Sky News Australia documentary, and a day-long event by the Museum of Australian Democracy, streamed live from Old Parliament House.
The event, chaired by Barrie Cassidy, features journalists Paul Kelly and Troy Bramston, and academic Professor Jenny Hocking—known critics of Kerr—most of whom align with the Labor party. This will likely create a highly charged atmosphere in the parliamentary precinct on what is otherwise a solemn day.
"Sir John Kerr simply gave [the Australian people] the opportunity to do so. And more importantly, that was a by-product of – not the motivation for – his decision."
"The latter, chaired by Barrie Cassidy, will include such partisan players as journalists Paul Kelly and Troy Bramston and academic Professor Jenny Hocking, all fierce Kerr antagonists."
Author's summary: The 50th anniversary of Sir John Kerr's constitutional intervention will reignite debates, highlighting ongoing partisan divisions surrounding his legacy.