Rethinking Human Roles in AI Warfare
According to Jovana Davidovic, Senior Researcher at the Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO), most policy proposals for managing AI risks in warfare rely on vague calls for 'meaningful human control' or 'appropriate human judgment'.
We cannot build effective governance for warfighting AI unless we are explicit about why we want humans involved, what kind of involvement we seek, and what exactly our policies are meant to govern.
Davidovic's article in Nature Machine Intelligence argues that a clear taxonomy of human engagement purposes, types, and targets is necessary for effective governance. This research is part of the PRIO project 'Ethical Risk Management for AI-Enabled Weapons: A Systems Approach (ERM)'.
Author's summary: Rethinking human roles in AI warfare for effective governance.
More News
- Acer Unveils Aspire 14 AI Laptops with Ryzen AI 7 350 Processor
- Two Man City stars shine vs Swansea as Pep Guardiola given £70m January transfer conundrum
- Fukuoka to Upgrade School Kitchens | Fukuoka Now
- Xinhua Silk Road: 2025 Chishui River Forum held in Guizhou, SW. China
- Bennie Thompson: Mississippi’s families deserve affordable health care, not political roulette
- Danielle Smith: Balancing the budget gets a lot easier if you build a pipeline
- Autonomy vs authority: Finding the balance that works
- Misrata Youth and Revolutionaries Movement: Misratans who met Khaled Haftar represent only themselves
- Xinhua Silk Road: Industrial and financial synergetic development to be engine for Northeast Asia's economy
- Rethinking human roles in AI warfare – Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO)